New Albany passes anti-toll resolution

Last night, the New Albany City Council approved the rough draft of a resolution condemning tolling as a means to pay for the $4.1 billion Ohio River Bridges Project — which will build an East End bridge, a Downtown bridge and an expansion of Spaghetti Junction — as well as specifically advocating that the project be scaled down.

Council members voted six in favor of the resolution, with three voting against.

“The thinking was that this is still in the early stages of a discussion on how this bridge project will be funded,” says John Gonder, at-large New Albany councilman. “Tolling is another tax to put on people, and as the resolution says (tolling is) an impediment to a cohesive metropolitan area, and serves as a barrier to free movement between New Albany and Louisville.”

Gonder also says the resolution explicitly calls for the construction of an East End bridge, which would span the Ohio River between the I-265/US-42 junction and Utica, In., and that the project as-is is too large to be built without tolls.

“The infrastructure of the bridges was paid for 40 years ago,” Gonder continues. “The Kennedy Bridge is paid for, and it just seems that the downtown bridge is the driver for the tolls. From our perspective in New Albany — these are my words; I’m not speaking for anybody else on the council, mind you — the downtown bridge is not going to be a real benefit, whereas the eastern bridge, that should take a lot of the pass-through traffic off the Kennedy bridge. You may find, once that eastern bridge is built, you don’t need a downtown bridge anyway.”

New Albany’s stance comes the day after the wildly unpopular Louisville-Southern Indiana Bridges Authority unveiled a cadre of tolling options, the most nightmarish of which involves tolling Spaghetti Junction.

“Let’s focus on the eastern bridge,” says Gonder. “That’s the real solution to this entire issue.”

4 Comments

  1. Roger A. Baylor
    Posted August 20, 2010 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the coverage. NA Confidential’s take is here: “August 19 city council 2: No tolls for 1SI’s bridges, bitches.”

    http://cityofnewalbany.blogspot.com/2010/08/august-19-city-council-2-no-tolls-for.html

  2. Puhn Tang
    Posted August 20, 2010 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    The River Fields’ ninjas are crossing the creek as we speak. The good news is that Hoosiers don’t give a flip about old Louisville money and Courier-Journal pimp/lobbyists.

  3. Curtis Morrison
    Posted August 20, 2010 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    @Roger – I linked to your awesome coverage already.
    @Puhn Tang – I think it’s important to recognize that River Fields ninjas are not the toll-advocating villian in this phase of the fight. In the kind of irony that makes it difficult for me to breathe, they have the same objective as the majority of the community right now, which is: WHOA!
    Now when we go, post-WHOA, with 80% of the community for down-sizing the project to a TOLL-FREE EAST END BRIDGE, yeah, that’s when we need to look out for their ninjas again. But now, frankly, it’s Jerry Abramson’s Bridges Coalition being fronted by David Nicklies and GLI.
    When Judy Kredence with SOA asked Abramson ON AIR my question: “How much $ was already available for the ORBP & wasn’t it enough for the East End bridge?” His deceptive answer speaks volumes: “I don’t know how much there is but it’s not enough for the East End Bridge.”
    Kind of like saying “I don’t know how much money’s in my checking account but I know I’m gonna to Vegas and there’s gonna be lots of hookers and gin.” Peace.

  4. Roger A. Baylor
    Posted August 20, 2010 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    In the interest of accuracy, permit me to note that the vote was 6-2, with one member abstaining.

One Trackback

  1. [...] night, the southern Indiana town joined the New Albany City Council and Louisville Metro Council, which have already approved similar anti-tolling measure. A similar [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*