Rep. Yarmuth proposes Constitutional amendment to combat Citizens United decision

Many have said that the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision allowing unlimited corporate spending in politics was the beginning of the end for American democracy, aided and abetted by Mitch McConnell’s crusade to enshrine to principle that money equals free speech.

This morning, from the heart of McConnell’s hometown, Rep. John Yarmuth is proposing a constitutional amendment to breath some life back into American democracy.

Here’s the full press release from Yarmuth:

Yarmuth Introduces Bipartisan Bill to Get Money Out of Politics

Constitutional amendment overturns key provision of Citizens United, establishes that money does not equal speech; also allows for public financing of federal elections.

WASHINGTON – Today, Congressman John Yarmuth (Ky-03) will introduce a Constitutional amendment to get money out of politics by overturning a key provision of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which opened the floodgates for special-interest influence on elections and in Washington.

The amendment, which Yarmuth will introduce alongside Republican Congressman Walter Jones (NC-03), establishes that financial expenditures and in-kind contributions do not qualify as protected speech under the First Amendment. It also enables Congress to establish a public financing system that would serve as the sole source of funding for federal elections.

“Corporate money equals influence, not free speech,” Yarmuth said. “The last thing Congress needs is more corporate candidates who don’t answer to the American people. Until we get big money out of politics, we will never be able to responsibly address the major issues facing American families – and that starts by ensuring our elections and elected officials cannot be bought by the well-off and well-connected.”

“If we want to change Washington and return power to the citizens of this nation, we have to change the way campaigns are financed,” Jones said. “The status quo is dominated by deep-pocketed special interests, and that’s simply unacceptable to the American people.”

In a 5-4 decision in January 2010, the Supreme Court struck down key provisions of federal election law, allowing corporations to spend general treasury funds for communications that advocate for the election or defeat of a specific candidate. In its Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision, the Court determined that a ban on these expenditures violates the First Amendment – reversing nearly 100 years of established legal precedent.

By establishing that money does not equal protected speech, the Yarmuth-Jones Amendment (attached) allows Congress to regulate campaign finance without a constitutional challenge under Citizens United.

The effect of unrestricted corporate spending in elections has been dramatic. Outside groups spent four times more money (a 427 percent increase) on midterm elections in 2010 than in 2006. And because there are no new disclosure requirements on corporate “persons,” much of the money has been spent outside the view of the American public.

The DISCLOSE Act, which Yarmuth cosponsored, would have installed disclosure requirements for new corporate spenders. But Senate Republicans used a filibuster to defeat it last year.

Yarmuth is a longtime supporter of campaign finance reform. He is a cosponsor of the Fair Elections Now Act to establish a public financing system for federal elections. He is also a cosponsor of the Shareholder Protection Act, which directs the Securities and Exchange Commission to issue rules that require corporations to disclose political contributions to their shareholders.

Last year, Yarmuth introduced a resolution calling on Congress to mitigate the effects of Citizens United. He also joined an amicus brief to the Supreme Court supporting Arizona’s public financing system for elections.


  1. kentondem
    Posted December 21, 2011 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Should I hold my breath while I wait for Ben Chandler to sign on as a co-sponsor ?

  2. Joy Puliafico
    Posted October 18, 2013 at 1:01 am | Permalink

    This is actually a good A to Z on how to establish a strong online presence! Fantastic info, quite newbie-friendly, comprehensive and thorough!

  3. Rita Sengbusch
    Posted October 24, 2013 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    It�s arduous to find knowledgeable people on this topic, but you sound like you recognize what you�re talking about! Thanks

  4. Mohammed Kalima
    Posted October 27, 2013 at 3:00 am | Permalink

    After examine a couple of of the weblog posts in your web site now, and I really like your means of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site listing and will likely be checking again soon. Pls try my website as properly and let me know what you think.

  5. Althea Cagno
    Posted November 8, 2013 at 3:34 am | Permalink

    There are some interesting points in time in this article but I don�t know if I see all of them center to heart. There is some validity but I will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want more! Added to FeedBurner as nicely

    Posted July 10, 2014 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Incroyablement attractif, je pense que ce post devrait intéresser un pote

4 Trackbacks

  1. [...] v. Citizens United, a Constitutional Amendment December 20, 2011By David M. F. SchankulaVia Sonka: Yarmuth Introduces Bipartisan Bill to Get Money Out of [...]

  2. [...] Rep. John Yarmuth went on MSNBC’s Dylan Ratigan Show yesterday to discuss his proposed constitutional amendment to gut the democracy-gutting Citizens United [...]

  3. [...] suggested that we amend the Constitution to overturn Citizens United. Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY) proposed the same thing back in December 2011. No wonder Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said [...]

  4. By Before It's News on June 21, 2012 at 6:38 am

    [...] suggested that we amend the Constitution to overturn Citizens United. Rep. John Yarmuth (D-KY) proposed the same thing back in December 2011. No wonder Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said [...]