McConnell blasts radical idea of letting Americans know who is buying their democracy

Sen. Mitch McConnell has always been a proponent of allowing democracy to be purchased by the highest bidder. Such a political process would (and currently does, post-Citizens United) give the Republican Party an inherent electoral advantage, while also allowing McConnell to appear as if he is some sort of “free speech” advocate.

As Fred Hiatt noted in his Washington Post op-ed yesterday, in return for this “Democracy for Sale” scenario, McConnell has always argued that as long as we have full and transparent disclosure of who is spending money on what, the system will not be corrupted or abused.

But as you can see from this speech at the American Enterprise Institute from Friday, McConnell is now fully on board with secret donations to groups for political advertisements:

As Steve Benen notes, McConnell says that Americans knowing who is purchasing ads for secretive groups is a threat to…. yes, democracy and freedom itself:

And what are the “efforts” that have McConnell so outraged? The senator “cited a Democratic proposal to require corporations and unions to disclose their spending on political advertising.”

Yes, in Mitch McConnell’s mind, the DISCLOSE Act is “nothing less than an effort by the government itself to expose its critics to harassment and intimidation, either by government authorities or through third-party allies.”

As far as the Senate Minority Leader is concerned, there’s nothing wrong with wealthy interests buying American elections — the real scandal is a proposal to let American voters know who’s doing the buying.

Yes, nothing says harassment and intimidation like an informed voting public.

Mitch McConnell led the filibuster of the DISCLOSE Act in 2010, despite easily passing the House and getting 59 votes in the Senate. The 2012 version of the bill is co-sponsored by Rep. John Yarmuth.

Yarmuth tells LEO that McConnell’s comparison of such disclosure requirements pushed by Obama to President Richard Nixon is rather telling.

“I understand why Nixon came to mind when Sen. McConnell was making this speech, but I think he’s projecting here,” Yarmuth says. “The senator believes anonymous donors using secret money should be able to influence elections — all out of the public view. Nixon wrote that playbook. If you oppose disclosure of campaign donors, you’re endorsing dishonesty. It’s the anonymity that allows people to lie in campaigns.”

4 Comments

  1. Bob
    Posted June 24, 2012 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    McConnel is a slees bag plain and simple.A real political pease of hourse dung.

  2. Selena Gomez Boobs
    Posted November 13, 2013 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    whoah this weblog is great i really like reading your articles.
    Keep up the great work! You know, a lot of people are
    looking around for this info, you could help them greatly.

  3. ugg キッズ 激安
    Posted January 1, 2014 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    I’m curious to find out what blog platform you’re using?
    I’m experiencing some minor security problems with my latest site and I would like
    to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any suggestions?

  4. ad agency
    Posted February 11, 2014 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    I think the admin of this website is truly working hard for
    his web site, as here every stuff is quality based stuff.

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] GA_googleFillSlot("FatLip-LeoBlog-Leaderboard"); GA_googleFillSlot("FatLip-LeoBlog-FullBanner"); « McConnell blasts radical idea of letting Americans know who is buying their democracy [...]

  2. [...] McConnell supports government invasion of individual privacy (i.e. patriot act) yet he fights to keep political donations private. [...]